Why Your Business Plan Just Killed Innovation

 Unless you are a fortune teller, long term business planning is a fantasy.

Why don’t we call plans what they really are: guesses.

Start referring to your business plans as business guesses , your financial plans as financial guesses and your strategic plans as strategic guesses.

Now you can stop worrying about them so much.

Jason Fried and David Heinemeier Hansson – “Rework”

Turtles

One of the reasons that your organisation or sector has largely stuck to “business as usual” is the great little idea that you , your customers or colleagues have in your heads has stayed there.

You might be worried that your suggestion of a different way of doing things may be dismissed as fanciful , naive or even WTTOIDW (“We Tried That Once It Didn’t Work”).

But supposing you take the plunge and your idea lives beyond its first breath: You now have something far worse to contend with.

The business plan.

One of the reasons why innovation fails to take hold in many organisations is our relentless focus on long term business planning.

Your great idea is going to get mortally wounded the moment it hits a 20 page project initiation document. And if it does survive that it has to go through a series of internal approvals culminating in the trial by fire that is the 30 page Board Report.

The odds of a turtle hatchling reaching adulthood are said to be 1 in 1,000. But in most organisations the chance of an idea reaching maturity has significantly worse odds.

But why is this?

Most businesses would agree that innovation is vital for future success –  but very few can articulate how they protect new ideas from becoming an endangered species.

And this is one of the problems we have: Innovation is treated the same way as everything else – whether it’s forecasting how much coffee people drink or estimating annual sick days.

We seek certainty where this is none and assurances of success where it can never be assured. We have grown afraid of failure.  And if there’s one thing we all know it’s – if you fear failure you cannot innovate.

There are very simple and easy ways to reintroduce the creative capacity in our organisations.  One is to skip the business plan altogether and start backwards. Literally. 

A company who do it well are Amazon.

After an idea is generated they start by writing a press release as if the product or service is ready for launch. They bring it to life.

It’s mocked up with pictures of the product and quotes from (imaginary) customers about how life changing it has been.  It’s passed around internally at the company, so that they can get feedback on the product, and to solicit any questions.

After getting an initial response (did it create a buzz?) and people adding their own ideas (building ideas – never destroying) it’s passed to a product development team to work it up.

But the team are fairly small – in fact they have to conform to the Two Pizza Rule. That is , there can’t be more of them than can be fed on two pizzas.  If you have to buy more than two large pizzas – the team is either too large … or the team members are. (There’s an important point here – large groups often become an average of themselves – they can kill innovation.)

Only when a shared vision is produced does the actual design stage begin. And guess what?  It happens quickly. As the idea has matured more people have contributed to it , bought into it,  and are dying to see it take its first steps.

It’s no longer an idea. It’s happening.

I’ve used the starting backwards approach on a few occasions and feel its a great way of introducing new concepts. In the past year I can think of at least two projects that have reached Board level – without a paper ever being written. I’ll be sharing how this can work in the context of non-profits over the next few weeks.

But what do you think? Do you agree that business plans and risk assessments can stifle innovation?

(Note: You can read a fascinating insight into the Amazon working backwards approach on the Werner Vogels blog from all the way back in 2006)

%d bloggers like this: