Ending Our Obsession With Leadership

Written in

by

Organisations need to completely rethink what it means to lead. It’s not about one person or even those residing at the top anymore. In today’s world, everyone has to adopt a leadership mindset. We have to think of ourselves as members of a leadership community  — Patty McCord, former chief talent officer, Netflix

Leadership worship – the act of mythologizing those near the top of organisations – is holding us back now more than ever.

When we look to others to make decisions, set the rules or uphold the culture we actively disempower ourselves, levying a huge inefficiency tax upon our organisations.

How much inefficiency? It could be 75% or higher.

US-BB-Report-S2-Bosses-are-Behind...-Img-1

According to a recent report –  the vast majority of employees wish their boss or manager would give them more responsibility, with 83%  wishing ‘leaders’ would ask for their opinion or input more often.

Far from shirking, employees are actually crying out to make more of a contribution at work.

Those kind of numbers suggest enormous amounts of talent, ideas and innovation are being squandered – all in the name of supporting a hierarchical approach to leadership by the few, rather than the many.

It’s not as if those leaders appear to have all the answers anyway. According to the World Economic Forum  86% of people agree that ‘we have a leadership crisis in the world today’ with an alarmingly weak correspondence between power and competency.

Additionally, a series of reports from MIT argues that current leaders lack the mindset needed to bring about the strategic and cultural changes required to lead in the new digital economy.

So you have two things going on:

You don’t have to be an expert in innovation to see that’s a busted model.

But is it our own obsession with leadership that is actually supporting this dysfunction?

As Neil Tamplin has written , in today’s world of work people want to be accountable for their own actions and our leaders can’t possibly know the fullness of every decision they make. In our increasingly uncertain operating environments, this model is setting ourselves up to fail because we choose to avoid vulnerability and uncertainty in favour of comfort.

US-BB-Report-S2-Bosses-are-Behind...-Img-2

Fear of Failure

So what’s stopping us? One reason organisations might not want to include their employees in their decision-making involves our focus on outcomes and a fear of failure.

The more people involved in decisions means the greater the risk of screwing things up – or so the conventional thinking goes. Mark Robinson has argued though that it’s often better to have poor outcomes with a great decision-making process than it is to have good outcomes with a poor decision-making process. His reasoning is that “you need a culture where people aren’t to blame for decisions. What your culture should be about is learning from bad decisions.”

Perhaps we need to lose the language of leadership altogether.

A Google search for leadership traits reveals a tiresome focus on visioning, strategizing and feedback loops – the kind of management bullshit we should have left back in the 1990s.

The real traits that matter such as empathy or self awareness, are key attributes for all human beings , not just for those of us who have a couple of line reports.

You will be hard-pressed nowadays to find a business that does not have some sort of a mentorship or development programme geared towards the leaders of tomorrow or emerging or aspiring leaders.

Hardly any of those self-same businesses will have programmes aimed at developing the ideas of tomorrow or creating the organisation of tomorrow.

It’s all about leaders. 

Arguably we are prioritising the perpetuation of existing systems and structures over meaningful change. Unless we address the root of the system, unless we really address how organisations make decisions and engage people, then we are not changing anything materially.

The new world of work requires us to become less fixated on the leader and more focused on leveraging the community at every level of our organisations.

Breeding the idea of the leader as superhero is getting us nowhere fast.

As we begin a new year the most radical thing you could do is rip up your plans for leadership development – and concentrate instead on how you can democratise innovation for the 80% rather than the 20%.

 

14 responses to “Ending Our Obsession With Leadership”

  1. Kay Hempsall Avatar

    Thanks for this thought piece – I have long agreed with the idea that moving away from the conversation about leadership towards behaviours that promote inclusion and respect for all have the opportunity to generate more productive workplaces … and ones that ultimately are that much more satisfying 🙂

  2. Following and Leading | Clyde Street Avatar

    […] (link). The first was by Paul Taylor and was titled Ending Our Obsession With Leadership (link). The second was by Rosie Angharad and was titled Caring: the bread and butter of sports coaching […]

  3. People Aren’t Sick Of Change. They’re Just Sick Of Change Programmes – Paul Taylor Avatar

    […] Despite this so-called resistance all the evidence shows that people want change on a scale like never seen before , both in our wider society and the workplace. […]

  4. The Creative Value Of Open-Mindedness – Paul Taylor Avatar

    […] Questions such of these are arguably at odds with our traditional idea of leadership. […]

  5. In A Post-COVID World The Manager Is The Weak Link – Paul Taylor Avatar

    […] first post I wrote this year was entitled ‘Ending Our Obsession With Leadership’. It argued that we should all become less fixated on the leader as superhero and more focused on […]

  6. The Problem With Constantly Finding Problems – Paul Taylor Avatar

    […] or their departments, even have problems. One of the reasons for this is that is it runs counter to the narrative of the heroic leader. Admitting that you don’t even know the problems you face, never mind the solutions to them, […]

  7. ComplexWales Avatar

    Well said. But I’m compelled to add the most important trap deployed by the leaderists, desperately clinging to their ideology. You’ve avoided the trap neatly, but I bet it’s caught in the minds of some of your readers, so I’ll be explicit. The answer to this crippling reality is NOT a different flavour of Leaderism – collective, distributed, systemic ad naseum – but to dispense with the whole ideology. Dump Leadership in favour of diverse Relationships, dump Leaderism in favour of widespread Participation. Time to move on, hooray 👏👏

    1. Paul Taylor Avatar

      I’d agree – and I think (hope) that the move to a more distributed model of work post-COVID for many may be a final nail in the leaderism coffin

  8. Why Do So Many People Want Us Back In The Office? – Paul Taylor Avatar

    […] truth the problem with work is not the tools or the physical location, but the obsession with leadership , an undue focus on work about work, an overbearing hierarchy and the lack of true digitisation of […]

  9. […] Taylor wrote about our obsession with leadership in January 2020, before covid-19 was the issue that is has since become in the UK. His conclusion […]

  10. Why We Need To Learn To Unlearn – Paul Taylor Avatar

    […] think a lot of this is rooted in our obsession with heroic leadership and leaderism. We have a disconnect before […]

  11. Why Leaders Don’t Spread Ideas – Paul Taylor Avatar

    […] I’ve had a few conversations with people over the past couple of weeks about the importance of connectors within organisations and their role in spreading ideas and good practice – so I thought I’d rework a previous post on this subject. […]

  12. […] ve iyi uygulamaların yayılmasındaki rolleri hakkında birkaç görüşmem oldu. Bu nedenle bu konuda daha önce yazdığım bir gönderiyi tekrar ele alabileceğimi […]

Leave a comment